Decision of the Intergovernmental Committee: 17.COM 14

The Committee,

  1. Having examined document LHE/22/17.COM/14 Rev.3 and its annexes,
  2. Recalling Article 8.3 of the Convention, Paragraphs 27, 28, 30, 39.3 and 40.3 (a) of the Operational Directives and Rules 20 and 39 of its Rules of Procedure,
  3. Further recalling its Decisions 9.COM11, 13.COM 14, 14.COM 18, 15.COM 10 and 16.COM 16, as well as its Resolutions 9.GA 9 and 9.GA 11,
  4. Establishes a consultative body to be known as the ‘Evaluation Body’ and adopts its terms of reference as annexed to this decision;
  5. Appoints the following individual experts and accredited non-governmental organizations as members of the Evaluation Body for 2023:

Experts representatives of States Parties non-Members of the Committee

  1. EG I: Ms Evrim Ölçer Özünel (Türkiye)
  2. EG II: Mr Rimvydas Laužikas (Lithuania)
  3. EG III: Mr Nigel Encalada (Belize)
  4. EG IV: Mr Kirk Siang Yeo (Singapore)
  5. EG V(a): Ms Tiana Lalaina Razafimanantsoa (Madagascar)
  6. EG V(b): Ms Nahla Abdallah Emam (Egypt)

Accredited non-governmental organizations

  1. EG I: Workshop intangible heritage Flanders
  2. EG II: European Association of Folklore Festivals
  3. EG III: Daniel Rubin de la Borbolla Center
  4. EG IV: Aigine Cultural Research Center – Aigine CRC
  5. EG V(a): The Cross-Cultural Foundation of Uganda (CCFU)
  6. EG V(b): Syria Trust for Development
6. Notes that for the purpose of elections at its future sessions, the twelve seats of the Evaluation Body shall be filled as follows:

Seats to be filled for the 2024 – 2027 cycles:

EG I NGO

EG II NGO

EG V(a) Expert

Seats to be filled for the 2025 – 2028 cycles:

EG III Expert

EG IV Expert

EG V(b) NGO

Seats to be filled for the 2026 – 2029 cycles:

EG III NGO

EG IV NGO

EG V(b) Expert

Seats to be filled for the 2027 – 2030 cycles:

EG I Expert

EG II Expert

EG V(a) NGO

  1. Decides to examine the 2023 cycle files in alphabetical order, starting with the files of States whose names begin with the letter N in the English alphabet, and requests that the Evaluation Body follow the same order when evaluating the files and that it presents its report in that order.

Annex: Terms of Reference of the Evaluation Body for the 2023 cycle

The Evaluation Body:

1.

Shall be composed of twelve members appointed by the Committee: six experts qualified in the various fields of intangible cultural heritage representative of States Parties
non-Members of the Committee and six accredited non-governmental organizations, taking into consideration equitable geographical representation and various domains of intangible cultural heritage;

2.

Shall elect its Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Rapporteur;

3.

Shall hold private meetings in accordance with Rule 19 of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee;

4.

Shall be responsible for the evaluation of nominations for inscription (including the transfer from one List to another, the extension or reduction of an already inscribed element) on the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding and on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, of proposed programmes, projects and activities that best reflect the principles and objectives of the Convention, of International Assistance requests greater than US$100,000 and of International Assistance requests submitted simultaneously with nominations to the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding or in the context of the request to transfer an element from the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity to the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, in conformity with the Operational Directives for the implementation of the Convention. It shall, in particular, include in its evaluation:

 

a.

An assessment of the conformity of nominations to the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding with the inscription criteria as provided in Chapter I.1 of the Operational Directives, including an assessment of the viability of the element and the feasibility and sufficiency of the safeguarding plan, and an assessment of the risks of it disappearing, as provided in Paragraph 29 of the Operational Directives;

 

b.

An assessment of the conformity of nominations to the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity with the inscription criteria, as provided in Chapter I.2 of the Operational Directives;

 

c.

An assessment of the conformity of proposed programmes, projects and activities that best reflect the principles and objectives of the Convention with the selection criteria, as provided in Chapter I.3 of the Operational Directives;

 

d.

An assessment of the conformity with the approval criteria, as provided in Chapter I.4 of the Operational Directives, of:

-       International Assistance requests greater than US$100,000;

-       International Assistance requests submitted simultaneously with nominations to the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding;

-       International Assistance requests submitted in the context of the request to transfer an element from the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity to the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding;

 

e.

Recommendations to the Committee:

-       To inscribe or not to inscribe the nominated element (including the transfer from one List to another, the extension or reduction of an already inscribed element) on the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding or the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, or to refer the nomination to the submitting State(s) for additional information;

-       To select or not to select the proposed programme, project or activity, or to refer the proposal to the submitting State(s) for additional information;

-       To approve or not to approve the International Assistance request greater than US$100,000, or to refer the request to the submitting State(s) for additional information;

-       To approve or not to approve the International Assistance request submitted in the context of the request to transfer an element from the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity to the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, or to refer the request to the submitting State(s) for additional information;

-       To approve or not to approve the International Assistance request submitted simultaneously with a nomination to the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, or to refer the request to the submitting State(s) for additional information; or

-       To maintain or to remove the inscribed element from the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding or the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, in case of ‘enhanced follow-up’;

-       To include or not, following its evaluation of a request for transfer, the successful safeguarding experience in the Register of Good Safeguarding Practices.

5.

Shall provide the Committee with an overview of all the files and a report of its evaluation;

6.

Shall conduct a dialogue process with submitting States Parties during the evaluation process, as provided in Chapter I.15 of the Operational Directives;

7.

Shall cease to exist following the submission and presentation to the eighteenth session of the Committee of the report on its evaluation of the files to be examined by the Committee in 2023 and with the establishment of the next Evaluation Body.

Once appointed by the Committee, the members of the Evaluation Body shall act impartially in the interests of all States Parties and of the Convention.

 

Top